Role 01
QA Leads
Need clearer release sign-off criteria and better regression scope decisions.
A practical QA and release process review for teams that want clearer test scope, stronger release decisions and fewer production surprises.
We review your current release workflow, PR process, test coverage signals and CI/CD gates to identify blind spots before your next release.
Run Partial NRT on impacted checkout and payment paths before approving release.
Example audit output · representative data
This audit is for teams that ship regularly but do not always have clear release risk visibility, test impact mapping or regression scope confidence.
Need clearer release sign-off criteria and better regression scope decisions.
Need visibility into risky PRs, CI blind spots and product impact.
Need a structured GO / CONDITIONAL GO / NO-GO decision process.
Need practical QA process improvements without hiring a full QA team.
Need fewer production surprises and better release accountability.
Need a clear map of where automated tests are strong or weak.
CI is green, but product risk is still unclear
Regression scope is guessed manually
Critical flows have weak or missing tests
PR review does not include test impact
Release sign-off lacks clear evidence
Override decisions are not documented
Smoke tests are too shallow
Full regression is used when Partial NRT would be enough
High-risk files are changed without additional checks
The audit is designed to be lightweight, practical and focused on actionable release improvements.
We collect basic context about your app, release process, repository structure, CI/CD and current test strategy.
We review how your team moves from PR to release approval.
We identify critical flows, risky areas, weak test signals and unclear decision points.
We evaluate how your team decides between Smoke, Partial NRT and Full NRT.
You receive a concise report with risk findings, recommended checks and practical next steps.
We review the findings and define your next improvement steps.
A structured overview of risky product areas, weak signals and possible release blockers.
A clear recommendation for when your team should run Smoke, Partial NRT or Full NRT.
A practical checklist your team can use before merging risky changes.
Concrete ideas for required checks, status checks and release gate improvements.
A reusable release sign-off template with decision rationale and reviewer notes.
Prioritized next steps for improving release safety without overengineering.
Deliverables can be provided as PDF, Notion page or Markdown document.
Checkout and payment retry changes before weekly production release.
Partial NRT
The release may proceed only after the recommended Partial NRT and manual payment retry validation are completed.
Start with a focused audit. Upgrade only if you need deeper CI/CD and automation review.
Best for · One critical flow or one upcoming release.
Best for · Small SaaS / web app teams that want release workflow review.
Best for · Teams that want CI/CD, automation and release gate improvement.
Prices shown are introductory. Booking goes to a brief intake form via email — no online payment required.
No. The audit is a practical service. Dulvarn SaaS automates parts of this workflow over time.
Not always. The Basic audit can work from screenshots, process description and test structure. Deeper reviews may need temporary read-only access or shared examples.
Yes. The audit is most useful before an upcoming release or after a painful regression.
No. It works for manual, hybrid and automated QA teams.
Yes. You receive a concise report with findings, risks and recommended next steps.
Yes. If your workflow is a good fit, the audit can be used as onboarding context for Dulvarn beta.
Book a focused audit and get a practical risk report, test scope recommendation and release decision improvement plan.